In re Asacol Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:15-cv-12730 (D. Mass.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for plaintiffs in an antitrust class action alleging Warner Chilcott unlawfully blocked competition for its Asacol franchise through an overarching scheme involving a series of “product hops,” filing baseless citizen petitions and patent litigation, and entering “pay for delay” agreements with a would-be competitor.

Read more ›

Anastasio v. Total Gas & Power North America, Inc. et al., No. 1:15-cv-09689-JGK (S.D.N.Y.) 

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for plaintiffs in a class action involving both antitrust and Commodity Exchange Act claims, alleging that a major oil and gas multinational manipulated natural gas prices at regional trading hubs in order to profit from derivatives involving the prices at those hubs.

Read more ›

In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation, No. 3:14-cv-03264-JD (N.D. Cal.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for plaintiffs in an antitrust class action alleging that manufacturers of capacitors (ubiquitous components found in virtually every electronic device) conspired to inflate capacitor prices.

Read more ›

In re Celebrex Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:14-cv-00361-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for plaintiffs in an antitrust class action alleging Walker Process fraud by Pfizer before the U.S. Patent Office.

Read more ›

Cung Le, et al. v. Zuffa, LLC, No. 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL (D. Nev.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for mixed martial arts (MMA) fighter plaintiffs in an antitrust action alleging that Zuffa, LLC, which does business as the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), is illegally controlling fighter services and sponsorship opportunities.

Read more ›

In re: Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:15-mc-01404-CKK (D.D.C.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for plaintiffs in an antitrust class action alleging several major airlines unlawfully conspired to inflate airfares by artificially constraining the supply in the market for domestic air travel.

Read more ›

Filannino-Restifo v. TD Bank, N.A., No. 1:16-cv-02374-JBS-JS (D.N.J.)

Radice Law Firm was one of the Lead Counsel for plaintiffs in a consumer fraud class action alleging that a major commercial bank’s coin counting machines gave customers inaccurately low value for their coins for years.

Read more ›

In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:13-cv-07789-LGS (S.D.N.Y.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for plaintiffs in an antitrust action alleging that certain large banks engaged an unlawful scheme to manipulate the foreign exchange currency market.

Read more ›

In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation, No. 3:14-md-02521-WHO (N.D. Cal.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for plaintiffs in an antitrust class action alleging that Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and its manufacturing partner, Teikoku Pharma, unlawfully forestalled generic Lidoderm through a “pay for delay” agreement with its would-be competitor Watson Pharmaceuticals.

Read more ›

In re Loestrin 24 Fe Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:13-md-02472-S-PAS (D.R.I.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for direct purchaser plaintiffs in an antitrust action alleging an unlawful scheme to monopolize the market for Loestrin 24 oral contraceptives.

Read more ›