In re Intuniv Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:16-cv-12653 (D.Mass.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for direct purchaser plaintiffs in an antitrust action alleging an unlawful scheme by Shire and Actavis to monopolize the market for the ADHD medication Intuniv (guanfacine hydrochloride). The case is in discovery in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts following the court’s denial of defendants’ motion to dismiss in October 2017.

In re Dental Supplies Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:16-cv-00696-BMC-GRB (E.D.N.Y.)

Radice Law Firm is court-appointed Liaison Counsel for plaintiffs in an antitrust class action alleging that four of the largest distributors of dental supplies and equipment colluded to artificially inflate the prices of dental supplies and equipment.

Read more ›

In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation, No. 3:14-cv-03264-JD (N.D. Cal.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for plaintiffs in an antitrust class action alleging that manufacturers of capacitors (ubiquitous components found in virtually every electronic device) conspired to inflate capacitor prices.

Read more ›

Cung Le, et al. v. Zuffa, LLC, No. 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL (D. Nev.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for mixed martial arts (MMA) fighter plaintiffs in an antitrust action alleging that Zuffa, LLC, which does business as the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), is illegally controlling fighter services and sponsorship opportunities.

Read more ›

In re: Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:15-mc-01404-CKK (D.D.C.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for plaintiffs in an antitrust class action alleging several major airlines unlawfully conspired to inflate airfares by artificially constraining the supply in the market for domestic air travel.

Read more ›

In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:13-cv-07789-LGS (S.D.N.Y.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for plaintiffs in an antitrust action alleging that certain large banks engaged an unlawful scheme to manipulate the foreign exchange currency market.

Read more ›

In re Loestrin 24 Fe Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:13-md-02472-S-PAS (D.R.I.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for direct purchaser plaintiffs in an antitrust action alleging an unlawful scheme to monopolize the market for Loestrin 24 oral contraceptives.

Read more ›

In re National Football Leagues Sunday Ticket Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:15-ml-02668-BRO-JEM (C.D. Cal.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for plaintiffs in an antitrust class action alleging supra-competitive pricing for DirecTV’s NFL Sunday Ticket service as a result of unlawful exclusive agreements with the NFL.

Read more ›

In re Niaspan Antitrust Litigation, No. 1:13-md-02460-JD (E.D. Pa.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for direct purchaser plaintiffs in an antitrust action alleging an unlawful scheme to monopolize the market for cholesterol medication Niaspan.

Read more ›

In re: Generic Digoxin and Doxycycline Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:16-md-02724-CMR (E.D. Pa.)

Radice Law Firm is one of class counsel for plaintiffs in an antitrust class action alleging that several drug manufacturers conspired to raise the price of generic digoxin and doxycycline far above competitive levels.

Read more ›